The UT's endorsements can be found here. They're pretty standard, but the only thing that stood out was the Yes Votes on Indian Gaming Props 94,95 and 97. What about 96?
The only difference I could see, at first, was that the Sycuan's pact (Prop 96) was in San Diego County and the others were not. But, apparently, 96 includes a provision to allow them to build a casino off tribal land.
I still don't know how I feel about the whole bullshit, oh, righ, propostions, in general, but I geuss this is why you should actually read what you're voting on.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment